Advertisement
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Clinical Research| Volume 30, ISSUE 2, P237-243, February 2014

Use and Misuse of Ezetimibe: Analysis of Use and Cost in Saskatchewan, a Canadian Jurisdiction With Broad Access

Published:December 09, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2013.11.031

      Abstract

      Background

      Saskatchewan is the only Canadian province that lists ezetimibe for open formulary access even though it is a second-line agent for lowering cholesterol.

      Methods

      A retrospective analysis of ezetimibe use in Saskatchewan between 2002 and 2011 was carried out using provincial health administrative databases. Overall use and costs of ezetimibe were described over time. Among new users of ezetimibe, the percentage who received the drug as first-line monotherapy was estimated. First-line monotherapy was defined as no statin dispensations in the 365 days before and the 60 days after the first ezetimibe dispensation. Potential predictors of first-line monotherapy were assessed using generalized linear mixed-effect models.

      Results

      In 2004, ezetimibe represented 2.5% of cholesterol-lowering dispensations. In 2011, its use increased to 8.8% of cholesterol-lowering dispensations and 13.2% of the total cost of cholesterol-lowering agents. Overall, ezetimibe was used as first-line monotherapy in 23% of all new users (4024 of 17,475 patients). Approximately half of all cases of first-line monotherapy were prescribed by 10.4% (112 of 1074) of prescribers in the cohort. Patients who had experienced previous acute coronary syndrome or who had undergone coronary revascularization procedures were significantly less likely to receive first-line monotherapy.

      Conclusions

      A high proportion of ezetimibe's use is not in accordance with evidence-based recommendations. Suboptimal prescribing could partially explain current patterns of use; however, other factors such as medication nonadherence may have played an important role. Restricting ezetimibe use in the provincial formulary in addition to improving prescribers' awareness through academic detailing should be considered.

      Résumé

      Introduction

      La Saskatchewan est la seule province canadienne qui inscrit l’ézétimibe à la liste des médicaments à accès libre même s’il est un agent hypocholestérolémiant de deuxième intention.

      Méthodes

      Une analyse rétrospective de l’utilisation de l’ézétimibe en Saskatchewan a été réalisée entre 2002 et 2011 en utilisant la base de données administratives provinciales sur la santé. Dans l’ensemble, l’utilisation et les coûts de l’ézétimibe ont été décrits avec le temps. Parmi les nouveaux utilisateurs de l’ézétimibe, le pourcentage de ceux qui prenaient le médicament en monothérapie de première intention a été évalué. La monothérapie de première intention a été définie comme la non-délivrance de statines au cours des 365 jours précédents et les 60 jours suivants la première délivrance d’ézétimibe. Les prédicteurs potentiels de la monothérapie de première intention ont été évalués en utilisant les modèles linéaires généralisés à effets mixtes.

      Résultats

      En 2004, l’ézétimibe représentait 2,5 % de la délivrance d’hypocholestérolémiants. En 2011, son utilisation a augmenté à 8,8 % de la délivrance des hypocholestérolémiants et à 13,2 % du coût total des agents hypocholestérolémiants. Dans l’ensemble, l’ézétimibe a été utilisé en monothérapie de première intention chez 23 % de tous les utilisateurs (4024/17 475). Approximativement la moitié de tous les cas de monothérapie de première intention ont reçu l’ordonnance de 10,4 % (112/1074) des personnes autorisées à prescrire des médicaments de la cohorte. Les sujets ayant auparavant eu un syndrome coronarien aigu ou subi des interventions de revascularisation coronarienne étaient considérablement moins susceptibles de recevoir la monothérapie de première intention.

      Conclusions

      Une forte proportion de l’utilisation de l’ézétimibe n’est pas conforme aux recommandations fondées sur les données probantes. Une prescription sous-optimale pourrait partiellement expliquer les modèles actuels d’utilisation. Cependant, d’autres facteurs comme la non-observance de la médication peut avoir joué un rôle important. L’inscription de l’ézétimibe à la liste provinciale des médicaments à accès restreint et l’amélioration de la conscientisation des personnes autorisées à prescrire des médicaments par la formation continue en pharmacothérapie devraient être considérées.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Zoler M.
        Ezetimibe's rapid US adoption called flawed.
        Int Med News. 2008; 41: 44
        • Sharma M.
        • Ansari M.
        • Abou-Setta A.
        • et al.
        Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combination therapy and monotherapy for dyslipidemia.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 622-630
        • Pearson T.A.
        • Denke M.A.
        • McBride P.E.
        • et al.
        A community-based, randomized trial of ezetimibe added to statin therapy to attain NCEP ATP III goals for LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients: the ezetimibe add-on to statin for effectiveness (EASE) trial.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80: 587-595
        • Bays H.E.
        • Ose L.
        • Fraser N.
        • et al.
        A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial design study to evaluate the lipid-altering efficacy and safety profile of the ezetimibe/simvastatin tablet compared with ezetimibe and simvastatin monotherapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
        Clin Ther. 2004; 26: 1758-1773
        • Roeters van Lennep H.W.
        • Liem A.H.
        • Dunselman P.H.
        • et al.
        The efficacy of statin monotherapy uptitration versus switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin: Results of the EASEGO study.
        Curr Med Res Opin. 2008; 24: 685-694
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Benjamin E.J.
        • Bonow R.O.
        • et al.
        AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology foundation.
        Circulation. 2011; 124: 2458-2473
        • Dujovne C.A.
        • Williams C.D.
        • Ito M.K.
        What combination therapy with a statin, if any, would you recommend?.
        Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011; 13: 12-22
        • Jackevicius C.A.
        • Tu J.V.
        • Ross J.S.
        • Ko D.T.
        • Krumholz H.M.
        Use of ezetimibe in the United States and Canada.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1819-1828
      1. Government of Saskatchewan. Drug plan and extended benefits branch annual report 2010-2011. Available at: http://formulary.drugplan.health.gov.sk.ca/Publns.aspx. Accessed December 23, 2013.

        • Lamb D.
        • Eurich D.
        • McAlister F.
        • et al.
        Changes in adherence to evidence-based medications in the first year after initial hospitalization for heart failure: observational cohort study from 1994 to 2003.
        Circulation. 2009; 2: 228
        • Tulloch J.
        • Evans B.
        Evaluation of the accuracy of the Saskatchewan Health Pharmaceutical Information Program for determining a patient's medication use immediately before admission.
        Can J Hosp Pharm. 2009; 62: 21-27
        • Liu L.
        • Reeder B.
        • Shuaib A.
        • Mazagri R.
        Validity of stroke diagnosis on hospital discharge records in Saskatchewan, Canada: implications for stroke surveillance.
        Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999; 9: 224-230
        • Blackburn D.F.
        • Dobson R.T.
        • Blackburn J.L.
        • Wilson T.W.
        Cardiovascular morbidity associated with nonadherence to statin therapy.
        Pharmacotherapy. 2005; 25: 1035-1043
        • Blackburn D.F.
        • Dobson R.T.
        • Blackburn J.L.
        • et al.
        Adherence to statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following a first cardiovascular event: a retrospective cohort study.
        Can J Cardiol. 2005; 21: 485-488
        • Evans C.
        • Eurich D.
        • Lamb D.
        • et al.
        Retrospective observational assessment of statin adherence among subjects patronizing different types of community pharmacies in Canada.
        J Manag Care Pharm. 2009; 15: 476-484
        • Kackar R.N.
        • Harville D.A.
        Approximations for standard errors of estimators of fixed and random effect in mixed linear models.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1984; 79: 853-862
        • Karim M.R.
        • Zeger S.L.
        Generalized linear models with random effects; salamander mating revisited.
        Biometrics. 1992; 48: 631-644
        • Theall K.P.
        • Scribner R.
        • Cohen D.
        • et al.
        The neighborhood alcohol environment and alcohol-related morbidity.
        Alcohol Alcohol. 2009; 44: 491-499
        • Snijders T.A.B.
        • Boesker R.J.
        Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.
        Sage, London1999
        • Belsley D.A.
        • Belsley D.A.
        Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity.
        Wiley, New York1980
        • Bickel P.J.
        • Bickel P.J.
        Mathematical statistics: basic ideas and selected topics.
        Holden-Day, San Francisco1977
        • Hosmer D.W.
        • Lemeshow S.
        Applied logistic regression.
        2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ2000
        • McPherson R.
        • Frohlich J.
        • Fodor G.
        • Genest J.
        Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement—recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease.
        Can J Cardiol. 2006; 22: 913-927
        • Baigent C.
        • Blackwell L.
        • Emberson J.
        • et al.
        • Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration
        Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.
        Lancet. 2010; 376: 1670-1681
        • Ezzet F.
        • Wexler D.
        • Statkevich P.
        • et al.
        The plasma concentration and LDL-C relationship in patients receiving ezetimibe.
        J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 41: 943-949
        • Ara R.
        • Tumur I.
        • Pandor A.
        • et al.
        Ezetimibe for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
        Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12 (iii, xi-xiii, 1-212)
        • Perk J.
        • De Backer G.
        • Gohlke H.
        • et al.
        European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).
        Atherosclerosis. 2012; 223: 1-68
        • Jellinger P.S.
        • Smith D.A.
        • Mehta A.E.
        • et al.
        American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of atherosclerosis.
        Endocr Pract. 2012; 18: 1-78
        • Genest J.
        • McPherson R.
        • Frohlich J.
        • et al.
        2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult—2009 recommendations.
        Can J Cardiol. 2009; 25: 567-579
        • Fischer M.A.
        • Stedman M.R.
        • Lii J.
        • et al.
        Primary medication non-adherence: analysis of 195,930 electronic prescriptions.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25: 284-290
        • Mancini G.B.
        • Baker S.
        • Bergeron J.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis, prevention, and management of statin adverse effects and intolerance: Proceedings of a Canadian Working Group Consensus Conference.
        Can J Cardiol. 2011; 27: 635-662
        • Manns B.
        • Laupland K.
        • Tonelli M.
        • Gao S.
        • Hemmelgarn B.
        Evaluating the impact of a novel restricted reimbursement policy for quinolone antibiotics: a time series analysis.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12: 290
        • Marshall D.
        • Gough J.
        • Grootendorst P.
        • et al.
        Impact of administrative restrictions on antibiotic use and expenditure in Ontario: time series analysis.
        J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006; 11: 13-20
        • Marra F.
        • Patrick D.M.
        • White R.
        • et al.
        Effect of formulary policy decisions on antimicrobial drug utilization in British Columbia.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 55: 95-101
        • Walthour A.
        • Seymour L.
        • Tackett R.
        • Perri M.
        Assessment of changes in utilization of health-care services after implementation of a prior authorization policy for atypical antipsychotic agents.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2010; 44: 809-818
        • Hodgkin D.
        • Parks T.C.
        • Simoni-Wastila L.
        • Ritter G.A.
        • Lee S.
        The effect of a three-tier formulary on antidepressant utilization and expenditures.
        J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008; 11: 67-77
        • Godman B.
        • Sakshaug S.
        • Berg C.
        • Wettermark B.
        • Haycox A.
        Combination of prescribing restrictions and policies to engineer low prices to reduce reimbursement costs.
        Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011; 11: 121-129