Advertisement
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Clinical Research| Volume 32, ISSUE 3, P336-343, March 2016

The Risk Stratification and Stroke Prevention Therapy Care Gap in Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Published:October 14, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.012

      Abstract

      Background

      Canadian atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend that all AF patients be risk stratified with respect to stroke and bleeding, and that most should receive antithrombotic therapy.

      Methods

      As part of the Canadian Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (FREEDOM AF) chart audit, data were collected on 4670 patients ≥ 18 years old without significant valvular heart disease from the primary care practices of 474 physicians (February to September, 2011).

      Results

      Physicians did not provide an estimate of stroke and bleeding risk in 15% and 25% of patients, respectively. When risks were provided, they were on the basis of a predictive stroke and bleeding risk index in only 50% and 26% of patients, respectively. There were over- and underestimation of stroke and bleeding risk in a large proportion of patients. Antithrombotic therapy included warfarin (90%); 24% of patients had a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) < 50%, 9% between 50% and 60%, 11% between 60% and 70%, and 56% had a TTR ≥ 70%.

      Conclusions

      In a large Canadian AF population, primary care physicians did not provide a stroke or bleeding risk in a substantial proportion of their AF patients. When estimates were provided, they were on the basis of a predictive stroke and bleeding risk index in less than half of the patients. Furthermore, there was under- and overestimation of stroke and bleeding risk in a substantial proportion of patients. As many as 1 in 3 patients receiving warfarin have their TTR < 60%. These findings suggest an opportunity to enhance knowledge translation to primary care physicians.

      Résumé

      Introduction

      Selon les lignes directrices canadiennes sur la fibrillation auriculaire (FA), il est recommandé que tous les patients fassent l’objet d’une stratification du risque relativement aux accidents vasculaires cérébraux (AVC) et aux hémorragies et que la plupart d’entre eux reçoivent un traitement antithrombotique.

      Méthodes

      Dans le cadre du projet canadien de revue de dossiers médicaux intitulé FREEDOM AF (Facilitating Review and Education to Optimize Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation), des données ont été recueillies sur 4670 patients âgés de 18 ans ou plus ne présentant pas de valvulopathie importante à partir de dossiers tenus par 474 médecins de soins primaires (de février à septembre 2011).

      Résultats

      Les médecins n’avaient indiqué aucune donnée relative au risque d’AVC et d’hémorragie dans 15 % et 25 % des cas, respectivement. Lorsqu’il y avait mention du risque, celui-ci était basé sur un indice de prédiction du risque d’AVC et d’hémorragie pour seulement 50 % et 26 % des patients, respectivement. En outre, dans une forte proportion des cas, le risque d’AVC et d’hémorragie avait été soit surestimé, soit sous-estimé. Parmi les traitements antithrombotiques administrés, on comptait notamment la warfarine (90 %); 24 % des patients recevant ce traitement avaient un temps dans la marge thérapeutique (TMT) inférieur à 50 %, 9 % des patients avaient un TMT entre 50 et 60 %, 11 % des patients avaient un TMT entre 60 et 70 %, et 56 % des patients avaient un TMT égal ou supérieur à 70 %.

      Conclusion

      Dans une importante population de patients canadiens, les médecins de soins primaires n’ont pas indiqué de risque d’AVC et d’hémorragie pour une grande proportion des patients atteints de FA, et lorsqu’un tel risque était indiqué, il était basé sur un indice de prédiction du risque d’AVC et d’hémorragie pour moins de la moitié des patients. De plus, il y avait eu surestimation ou sous-estimation du risque d’AVC et d’hémorragie pour une importante proportion de patients. Enfin, chez les patients traités par la warfarine, 1 sur 3 avait un TMT inférieur à 60 %. De tels résultats suggèrent qu’il serait souhaitable d’améliorer la formation des médecins de soins primaires dans ce domaine d’application.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Atrial Fibrillation Statistics - Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Available at: http://www.heartandstroke.on.ca/site/c.pvI3IeNWJwE/b.3581729/k.359A/Statistics.htm#atrialfib. Accessed November 26, 2014.

        • Gladstone D.J.
        • Bui E.
        • Fang J.
        • et al.
        Potentially preventable strokes in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who are not adequately anticoagulated.
        Stroke. 2009; 40: 235-240
        • Cairns J.A.
        • Connolly S.
        • McMurtry S.
        • Stephenson M.
        • Talajic M.
        Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: prevention of stroke and systemic thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation and flutter.
        Can J Cardiol. 2011; 27: 74-90
        • Skanes A.C.
        • Healey J.S.
        • Cairns J.A.
        • et al.
        Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines: recommendations for stroke prevention and rate/rhythm control.
        Can J Cardiol. 2012; 28: 125-136
        • Verma A.
        • Cairns J.A.
        • Mitchell L.B.
        • et al.
        2014 Focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation.
        Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30: 1114-1130
        • Gage B.F.
        • Waterman A.D.
        • Shannon W.
        • et al.
        Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 2864-2870
        • Lip G.Y.
        • Nieuwlaat R.
        • Pisters R.
        • Lane D.A.
        • Crijns H.J.
        Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation.
        Chest. 2010; 137: 263-272
        • Pisters R.
        • Lane D.A.
        • Nieuwlaat R.
        • et al.
        A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation.
        Chest. 2010; 138: 1093-1100
        • Rosendaal F.R.
        • Cannegieter S.C.
        • van der Meer F.J.
        • Briet E.
        A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.
        Thromb Haemost. 1993; 69: 236-239
        • Apostolakis S.
        • Sullivan R.M.
        • Olshansky B.
        • Lip G.Y.
        Factors affecting quality of anticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin: the SAMe-TT2R2 Score.
        Chest. 2013; 144: 1555-1563
        • De Caterina R.
        • Husted S.
        • Wallentin L.
        • et al.
        Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: current status and perspectives (section III). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis - Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease.
        Thromb Haemost. 2013; 110: 1087-1107
        • Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Group
        Comparison of 12 risk stratification schemes to predict stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
        Stroke. 2008; 39: 1901-1910
        • Camm A.J.
        • Kirchhof P.
        • Lip G.Y.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
        Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 2369-2429
        • Lip G.Y.
        • Nielsen P.B.
        • Skjoth F.
        • Rasmussen L.H.
        • Larsen T.B.
        Atrial fibrillation patients categorized as “not for anticoagulation” according to the 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Algorithm are not “low risk.”.
        Can J Cardiol. 2015; 31: 24-28
        • Cairns J.A.
        • Healey J.S.
        • Macle L.
        • Mitchell L.B.
        • Verma A.
        The new Canadian Cardiovascular Society Algorithm for antithrombotic therapy of atrial fibrillation is appropriately based on current epidemiologic data.
        Can J Cardiol. 2015; 31: 20-23
        • Steinberg B.A.
        • Kim S.
        • Thomas L.
        • et al.
        Lack of concordance between empirical scores and physician assessments of stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation: results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Registry.
        Circulation. 2014; 129: 2005-2012
        • Man-Son-Hing M.
        • Laupacis A.
        Anticoagulant-related bleeding in older persons with atrial fibrillation: physicians’s fears often unfounded.
        Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 1580-1586
        • Gage B.F.
        • Yan Y.
        • Milligan P.E.
        • et al.
        Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF).
        Am Heart J. 2006; 151: 713-719
        • Fang M.C.
        • Go A.S.
        • Chang Y.
        • et al.
        A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage: the ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 395-401
        • Atarashi H.
        • Inoue H.
        • Okumura K.
        • et al.
        Present status of anticoagulation treatment in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation. A report from the J-RHYTHM Registry.
        Circ J. 2011; 75: 1328-1333
        • Ogilvie I.M.
        • Newton N.
        • Welner S.A.
        • Cowell W.
        • Lip G.Y.
        Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
        Am J Med. 2010; 123: 638-645
        • Mahmud A.
        • Bennett K.
        • Okechukwu I.
        • Feely J.
        National underuse of anti-thrombotic therapy in chronic atrial fibrillation identified from digoxin prescribing.
        Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 64: 706-709
        • Lip G.Y.
        • Laroche C.
        • Ioachim P.M.
        • et al.
        Prognosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation patients by European cardiologists: one year follow-up of the EURObservational Research Programme-Atrial Fibrillation General Registry Pilot phase (EORP-AF Pilot registry).
        Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 3365-3376