This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
BACKGROUND
The Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) has collaborated
with Québec's transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) programs since 2013 to
evaluate processes of care and outcomes. In 2018-2019, data were also collected on
surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Herein, we describe real-world volume and
outcome trends for these two patient groups, as well as processes of care and clinical
characteristics over a 6-month period.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Volume and mortality have been ascertained for TAVI since 2013 in collaboration with
all Québec programs, and from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)
for SAVR. From October 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019, patient characteristics and process
of care data were also collected, in collaboration with clinical teams, for all TAVI
and SAVR performed in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Rates of TAVI doubled between 2013-2014
and 2018-2019 (9.4 to 19.6 / 100,000 population), whereas rates of isolated SAVR (iSAVR)
remained stable (19.8 to 21.5 / 100,000 population). Thirty-day mortality post-TAVI
decreased from 4.8% in 2013-2016 to 2.4% in 2016-2019 amongst patients ≥ 75 years,
and from 3.7% to 2.3% in younger patients. For iSAVR, 30-day mortality during the
same periods decreased in patients ≥ 75 years, from 3.2% to 1.0%, but remained stable
(at 1.0%) in younger patients. During the 6-month 2018-2019 period, 300 TAVI and 129
iSAVR in patients ≥ 75 years were examined. TAVI patients had a higher median age
than iSAVR (84 vs. 78) and more comorbidities. For TAVI, median delay from referral
to treatment decision was 72 days (inter-quartile range, IQR: 11-138) and 28 days
(IQR: 7-75) from decision to procedure; for iSAVR, these were 17 (IQR: 1-49) and 63
days (IQR: 16-109), respectively. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR:
1-5) for TAVI, and 7 days (IQR: 6-10) for iSAVR. Incidence of in-hospital stroke,
new pacemaker and 30-day mortality was 3.3%, 17.7% and 2.3% for TAVI, respectively,
and 1.6%, 6.2% and 0% for iSAVR.
CONCLUSION
From 2013-2019, use of TAVI increased and a decrease in overall 30-day mortality associated
with treatment for severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis was observed. Amongst elderly
patients in 2018-2019, TAVI and SAVR patients had different characteristics, evaluation
processes and wait times. Broadening of TAVI to patients at low surgical risk raises
organizational and long-term clinical issues and may favour a shift from procedure-focused
to disease-centred evaluation processes.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Canadian Journal of CardiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.