BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death and disability globally. Cardiovascular
disease incidence varies by immigration status and sex. Sex differences in the quality
of primary cardiovascular preventive care have been described, but whether these differences
vary by immigration status is less understood. Intersectionality theory suggests that
sex, immigration status and ethnic origin interact synergistically, potentially leading
to differences in cardiovascular care and outcomes among men and women based on their
immigration status. Immigrants of diverse ethnicities represent 22% of the Canadian
population. We evaluated whether immigration status modified the association between
sex and the quality of primary cardiovascular disease prevention using a population-based
cohort in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We used administrative databases to identify community-dwelling adults (aged ≥ 40
years) without prior cardiovascular disease residing in Ontario on January 1, 2011.
We evaluated care in the preceding three years: screening for hyperlipidemia and diabetes
in those not previously diagnosed; medication use to control hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
or diabetes in those with a previous diagnosis; diabetes control (HbA1c < 7%); and
visits to a family physician or a specialist. We calculated the absolute prevalence
difference (APD) between women and men for each metric stratified by immigration status,
and then determined the difference-in-differences for immigrants compared to long-term
residents. Our sample population included 5.3 million adults (19% immigrants), with
receipt of each metric ranging from 55% to 90%. Among immigrants, women were more
likely than men to be screened for diabetes (APD 11.5% [95% confidence interval 11.1,
11.8]) and hyperlipidemia (APD 10.8% [10.5, 11.2]), to be treated with medications
for hypertension (APD 3.5% [2.4, 4.5]), diabetes (APD 2.1% [0.7, 3.6]) and hyperlipidemia
(APD 1.8% [0.5, 3.1]), and to have at least one visit to a primary care provider (APD
7.3% [6.9, 7.7]) and specialist (APD 14.2% [14.0, 14.5]) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Among
long-term residents, findings were similar except women were less likely than men
to be treated with medications for hypertension (APD -2.8% [-3.4, -2.2]) and hyperlipidemia
(APD -3.5% [-4.0, -3.0]) (Table 1 and Figure 1).
CONCLUSION
Women had equal or better primary cardiovascular preventive care than men, with similar
findings among immigrants and long-term residents treated in a healthcare setting
with universal health coverage. The overall quality of primary preventive care can
be improved for all adults, and future research should evaluate the impact of the
observed sex differences in care on cardiovascular disease incidence.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Canadian Journal of CardiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.