BACKGROUND
The association between travel time from the tertiary care centre and outcomes after
aortic surgery is unknown. Our objective was to determine the effect of estimated
travel time from tertiary care centre on outcomes in ascending aortic repair in Nova
Scotia.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A retrospective analysis of all elective and emergent ascending thoracic aortic operations,
performed either in isolation or in combination with other cardiac surgery procedures,
from 2005 and 2015 was carried out. Clinical characteristics as well as in-hospital
outcomes were recorded. Patient's residential geographical coordinates were used to
calculate estimated driving time using geographic information system software (ArcMAP,
ESRI). Socioeconomic deprivation quintiles were derived from the 2006 Census based
on the patient's residential postal code. Long-term survival was identified through
Vital Statistics database. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine
the independent effect of estimated travel time ≥1 hour on in-hospital outcomes. Cox-proportional
hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were created to determine the
independent effect of estimated travel time on long-term survival. A total of 476
patients underwent ascending thoracic aortic surgery from 2005 to 2015. Mean age was
59.1 (±13.3) years and 107 (22.5%) were female. Compared to patients at < 1 hour from
the tertiary care centre, patients who lived ≥1 hour did not experience higher rates
of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.45-5.00), composite in-hospital complications
(OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.62-1.91), discharge disposition to another institution or nursing
home (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.56-3.14), or prolonged hospital length of stay (OR 1.15, 95%
CI 0.68-1.93). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (Figure) and adjusted Cox proportional
hazard modeling revealed that patients who lived ≥1 hour from the tertiary centre
had increased long-term mortality (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.13-4.28, p=0.02). In a sensitivity
analysis of only elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair patients (n=380), there
was a persistent finding of increased mortality in patients who lived ≥1 hour from
the tertiary centre (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.14-5.75, p=0.02). Statistical analysis was
performed using Stata, version 14 (College Station, TX).
CONCLUSION
Compared to patients who live in close proximity to the tertiary centre, patients
at increased travel time experience equivalent in-hospital outcomes but decreased
long-term survival following ascending aortic operations. Resource expansion to improve
follow-up monitoring of patients who live remotely is needed.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Canadian Journal of CardiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.