Advertisement
Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Interventions Targeted to Address Social Determinants of Health in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Sex- and Gender-Oriented Scoping Review

      ABSTRACT

      The burden of ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major health problem worldwide. The detrimental effect of gendered (i.e., unevenly distributed between females and males) socioeconomic determinants of health (SDOH) on outcomes has been demonstrated, more so in female individuals. Therefore, addressing SDOH is a priority for the care implementation of patients with IHD. We conducted a scoping review to identify the types of SDOH-tailored interventions tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among IHD patients, and whether the reporting of findings was sex-unbiased. We identified 8 SDOH domains: education, physical environment, healthcare system, economic stability, social support, sexual orientation, culture/language, and systemic racism. A total of 28 RCTs (2 ongoing) were evaluated. Since the 1990s, 26 RCTs have been conducted, mainly in Middle East/Asia and addressed only education, physical environment, healthcare system and social support. The 77% of studies focused on patient-education interventions, and around 80% SDOH-based interventions achieved positive effects on a variety of primary outcome(s). Among the limitations of the conducted RCTs, the most relevant were an overall low participation of females and racial/ethnical minorities, the lack of sex-stratified analyses and the missing opportunity of tailoring some SDOH interventions relevant for health. The SDOH-tailored interventions tested so far in RCTs, enrolling predominantly male patients and mainly targeting education and health literacy, were effective in improving outcomes among IHD. Future studies should focus on a wider range of SDOH with an adequate representation of females and minorities, that most would benefit from such interventions.

      Graphical abstract

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES:

        • Virani S.S.
        • Alonso A.
        • Aparicio H.J.
        • et al.
        Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2021 Update.
        Circulation. 2021; 143: e254-e743https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950
        • Aggarwal N.R.
        • Patel H.N.
        • Mehta L.S.
        • et al.
        Sex Differences in Ischemic Heart Disease: Advances, Obstacles, and Next Steps.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018; 11e004437https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004437
        • Connelly P.J.
        • Azizi Z.
        • Alipour P.
        • Delles C.
        • Pilote L.
        • Raparelli V.
        The Importance of Gender to Understand Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease.
        Can J Cardiol. 2021; 37: 699-710https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.005
        • Marmot M.
        • Friel S.
        • Bell R.
        • Houweling T.A.J.
        • Taylor S.
        • Commission on Social Determinants of Health
        Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.
        Lancet Lond Engl. 2008; 372: 1661-1669https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6
        • Havranek E.P.
        • Mujahid M.S.
        • Barr D.A.
        • et al.
        Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: 873-898https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228
        • Safford M.M.
        • Reshetnyak E.
        • Sterling M.R.
        • et al.
        Number of Social Determinants of Health and Fatal and Nonfatal Incident Coronary Heart Disease in the REGARDS Study.
        Circulation. 2021; 143: 244-253https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048026
        • Raparelli V.
        • Pilote L.
        • Dang B.
        • et al.
        Variations in Quality of Care by Sex and Social Determinants of Health Among Younger Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the US and Canada.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4e2128182https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28182
        • Kreatsoulas C.
        • Anand S.S.
        The impact of social determinants on cardiovascular disease.
        Can J Cardiol. 2010; 26: 8C-13Chttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0828-282x(10)71075-8
        • Mauvais-Jarvis F.
        • Bairey Merz N.
        • Barnes P.J.
        • et al.
        Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine.
        Lancet Lond Engl. 2020; 396: 565-582https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0
        • White-Williams C.
        • Rossi L.P.
        • Bittner V.A.
        • et al.
        Addressing Social Determinants of Health in the Care of Patients With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2020; 141: e841-e863https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000767
      1. Lindley KJ, Aggarwal NR, Briller JE, et al. Socioeconomic Determinants of Health and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Women: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(19):1919-1929. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.011

      2. Mozaffarian Dariush, Benjamin Emelia J., Go Alan S., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29-e322. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152Pubmed Partial Author articletitle

        • Munn Z.
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Stern C.
        • Tufanaru C.
        • McArthur A.
        • Aromataris E.
        Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18: 143https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
        • Arksey H.
        • O’Malley L.
        Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.
        Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8: 19-32https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
        • Levac D.
        • Colquhoun H.
        • O’Brien K.K.
        Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
        Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 69https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
        • Campbell M.
        • Egan M.
        • Lorenc T.
        • et al.
        Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health.
        Syst Rev. 2014; 3: 114https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-114
      3. Peters MD, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Accessed February 1, 2022. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/3283910770/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews

        • Wenger N.K.
        Clinical characteristics of coronary heart disease in women: emphasis on gender differences.
        Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 53: 558-567https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00511-9
      4. Artiga S, Hinton E. Beyond Health Care: The Role of Social Determinants in Promoting Health and Health Equity. Kaiser Family Foundation. Published May 10, 2018. Accessed April 11, 2022. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/beyond-health-care-the-role-of-social-determinants-in-promoting-health-and-health-equity/

      5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Social Determinants of Health - Healthy People 2030. Accessed April 11, 2022. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health

      6. Haddaway NR, Grainger MJ, Gray CT. Citationchaser: An R Package for Forward and Backward Citations Chasing in Academic Searching.; 2021. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4543513

        • Chan M.Y.
        • Koh K.W.L.
        • Poh S.C.
        • et al.
        Remote Postdischarge Treatment of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction by Allied Health Care Practitioners vs Standard Care: The IMMACULATE Randomized Clinical Trial.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6: 830-835https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6721
        • Köhler A.K.
        • Jaarsma T.
        • Tingström P.
        • Nilsson S.
        The effect of problem-based learning after coronary heart disease – a randomised study in primary health care (COR-PRIM).
        BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020; 20: 370https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01647-2
        • Moshki M.
        • Mohammadipour F.
        • Gholami M.
        • Heydari F.
        • Bayat M.
        The evaluation of an educational intervention based on Pender’s health promotion model for patients with myocardial infarction.
        Int J Health Promot Educ. 2020; 0: 1-13https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2020.1816487
        • Zhao Y.
        • Wong F.K.Y.
        Effects of a postdischarge transitional care programme for patients with coronary heart disease in China: a randomised controlled trial.
        J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18: 2444-2455https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02835.x
      7. Oyur Çelik G, Güzelçiçek A, Çelik S. The Effects of Music Therapy on Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Before the Invasive Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Perianesth Nurs. Published online December 28, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2021.01.010

        • Ho P.M.
        • Lambert-Kerzner A.
        • Carey E.P.
        • et al.
        Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence and Secondary Prevention Measures After Acute Coronary Syndrome Hospital Discharge: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 186-193https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12944
        • Frasure-Smith N.
        • Lespérance F.
        • Prince R.H.
        • et al.
        Randomised trial of home-based psychosocial nursing intervention for patients recovering from myocardial infarction.
        The Lancet. 1997; 350: 473-479https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02142-9
        • Kure C.E.
        • Chan Y.K.
        • Ski C.F.
        • Thompson D.R.
        • Carrington M.J.
        • Stewart S.
        Gender-specific secondary prevention? Differential psychosocial risk factors for major cardiovascular events.
        Open Heart. 2016; 3e000356https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000356
        • Horne B.D.
        • Muhlestein J.B.
        • Lappé D.L.
        • et al.
        Behavioral Nudges as Patient Decision Support for Medication Adherence: The ENCOURAGE Randomized Controlled Trial.
        Am Heart J. 2022; 244: 125-134https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2021.11.001
        • Chow C.K.
        • Redfern J.
        • Hillis G.S.
        • et al.
        Effect of Lifestyle-Focused Text Messaging on Risk Factor Modification in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1255-1263https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10945
        • Karhula T.
        • Vuorinen A.L.
        • Rääpysjärvi K.
        • et al.
        Telemonitoring and Mobile Phone-Based Health Coaching Among Finnish Diabetic and Heart Disease Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial.
        J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17: e153https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4059
        • Mateti U.V.
        Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Counselling and Education on Quality of Life in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
        Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2016; 50: 360-367https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.50.3.7
      8. World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. IRCT20210609051528N1. Accessed March 26, 2022. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT20210609051528N1

      9. ClinicalTrials.gov. Implementation and Assessment of a Life-style Focused Patient Support Application (App) and Activity Trackers for Improving Risk Factor Management, Physical Activity, Quality of Life and Prognosis in Post-myocardial Infarction Patients. Published October 24, 2019. Accessed March 24, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03260582Pubmed Partial Author articletitle stitle stitle Volume Page

      10. Harrington KM, Nguyen XMT, Song RJ, et al. Gender Differences in Demographic and Health Characteristics of the Million Veteran Program Cohort. Womens Health Issues Off Publ Jacobs Inst Womens Health. 2019;29(Suppl 1):S56-S66. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2019.04.012

        • Hilliard A.L.
        • Winchester D.E.
        • Russell T.D.
        • Hilliard R.D.
        Myocardial infarction classification and its implications on measures of cardiovascular outcomes, quality, and racial/ethnic disparities.
        Clin Cardiol. 2020; 43: 1076-1083https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23431
        • Cho L.
        • Vest A.R.
        • O’Donoghue M.L.
        • et al.
        Increasing Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials: JACC Council Perspectives.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 78: 737-751https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.022
      11. Poushter J, Kent N. The Global Divide on Homosexuality Persists. Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. Published June 25, 2020. Accessed April 12, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/06/25/global-divide-on-homosexuality-persists/

      12. US Census Bureau. Measuring Racial and Ethnic Diversity for the 2020 Census. The United States Census Bureau. Accessed October 16, 2021. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2021/08/measuring-racial-ethnic-diversity-2020-census.html

      13. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Main Features - Cultural Diversity Data Summary. Published June 28, 2017. Accessed April 12, 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/2071.0main+features302016

      14. Government of Singapore. What are the racial proportions among Singapore citizens? Accessed April 12, 2022. http://www.gov.sg/article/what-are-the-racial-proportions-among-singapore-citizens

        • Magnani J.W.
        • Mujahid M.S.
        • Aronow H.D.
        • et al.
        Health Literacy and Cardiovascular Disease: Fundamental Relevance to Primary and Secondary Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2018; 138: e48-e74https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000579
        • Villaire M.
        • Mayer G.
        Health literacy: the low-hanging fruit in health care reform.
        J Health Care Finance. 2009; 36: 55-59
        • Song K.J.
        The effects of self-efficacy promoting cardiac rehabilitation program on self-efficacy, health behavior, and quality of life.
        Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2003; 33: 510-518https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2003.33.4.510
        • Redfern J.
        • Briffa T.
        • Ellis E.
        • Freedman S.B.
        Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: 1-year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trial.
        Heart. 2009; 95: 468-475https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.150870
      15. Yan J, You L ming, Liu B ling, et al. The effect of a telephone follow-up intervention on illness perception and lifestyle after myocardial infarction in China: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(6):844-855. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.011Pubmed Partial Author

        • Johnston N.
        • Bodegard J.
        • Jerström S.
        • et al.
        Effects of interactive patient smartphone support app on drug adherence and lifestyle changes in myocardial infarction patients: A randomized study.
        Am Heart J. 2016; 178: 85-94https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.005
        • Zhang P.
        • Hu Y.D.
        • Xing F.M.
        • Li C.Z.
        • Lan W.F.
        • Zhang X.L.
        Effects of a nurse-led transitional care program on clinical outcomes, health-related knowledge, physical and mental health status among Chinese patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized controlled trial.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2017; 74: 34-43https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.04.004
        • Hammill Bradley G.
        • Curtis Lesley H.
        • Schulman Kevin A.
        • Whellan David J.
        Relationship Between Cardiac Rehabilitation and Long-Term Risks of Death and Myocardial Infarction Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries.
        Circulation. 2010; 121: 63-70https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876383
        • Weibel L.
        • Massarotto P.
        • Hediger H.
        • Mahrer-Imhof R.
        Early education and counselling of patients with acute coronary syndrome. A pilot study for a randomized controlled trial.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016; 15: 213-222https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515114556713
        • Haddadzadeh M.H.
        • Maiya A.G.
        • Padmakumar R.
        • Shad B.
        • Mirbolouk F.
        Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on ejection fraction in coronary artery disease patients: a randomized controlled trial.
        Heart Views Off J Gulf Heart Assoc. 2011; 12: 51-57https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.86013
      16. Leon Arthur S., Franklin Barry A., Costa Fernando, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation. 2005;111(3):369-376. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000151788.08740.5CPubmed Partial Author articletitle

        • Turner A.
        • Murphy B.M.
        • Higgins R.O.
        • et al.
        An integrated secondary prevention group programme reduces depression in cardiac patients.
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 21: 153-162https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312467747
        • Zeighami R.
        • Behnammoghadam M.
        • Moradi M.
        • Bashti S.
        Comparison of the effect of eye movement desensitization reprocessing and cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety in patients with myocardial infarction.
        Eur J Psychiatry. 2018; 32: 72-76https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpsy.2017.09.001
        • Moradi M.
        • Zeighami R.
        • Moghadam M.
        • Javadi H.
        • Alipor M.
        Anxiety Treatment by Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Patients With Myocardial Infarction.
        Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016; (In press)https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.27368
        • Celano C.M.
        • Daunis D.J.
        • Lokko H.N.
        • Campbell K.A.
        • Huffman J.C.
        Anxiety disorders and cardiovascular disease.
        Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016; 18: 101https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0739-5
        • Ciğerci Y.
        • Özbayır T.
        The effects of music therapy on anxiety, pain and the amount of analgesics following coronary artery surgery.
        Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 24: 44-50https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2016.12136
        • Caceres B.A.
        • Brody A.
        • Luscombe R.E.
        • et al.
        A Systematic Review of Cardiovascular Disease in Sexual Minorities.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: e13-e21https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303630
        • Michos E.D.
        • Reddy T.K.
        • Gulati M.
        • et al.
        Improving the enrollment of women and racially/ethnically diverse populations in cardiovascular clinical trials: An ASPC practice statement.
        Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021; 8100250https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100250
        • Churchwell K.
        • Elkind M.S.V.
        • Benjamin R.M.
        • et al.
        Call to Action: Structural Racism as a Fundamental Driver of Health Disparities: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2020; 142: e454-e468https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000936
        • Johnson A.E.
        • Talabi M.B.
        • Bonifacino E.
        • et al.
        Racial Diversity Among American Cardiologists: Implications for the Past, Present, and Future.
        Circulation. 2021; 143: 2395-2405https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053566
      17. Bhavnani SP, Parakh K, Atreja A, et al. 2017 Roadmap for Innovation—ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(21):2696-2718. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.018Pubmed Partial articletitle Page

        • Clark L.T.
        • Watkins L.
        • Piña I.L.
        • et al.
        Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers.
        Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019; 44: 148-172https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002
        • Adler N.E.
        • Cutler D.M.
        • Fielding J.E.
        • et al.
        Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care.
        NAM Perspect. 2016; (Published online September 19)https://doi.org/10.31478/201609t
        • Mohammadpour A.
        • Rahmati Sharghi N.
        • Khosravan S.
        • Alami A.
        • Akhond M.
        The effect of a supportive educational intervention developed based on the Orem’s self-care theory on the self-care ability of patients with myocardial infarction: a randomised controlled trial.
        J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24: 1686-1692https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12775
        • Nie C.
        • Li T.
        • Guo X.
        Intensive Patients’ Education and Lifestyle Improving Program in CAD Patients.
        West J Nurs Res. 2019; 41: 1254-1269https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945918810205
        • Sundararajan S.
        • Thukani Sathanantham S.
        • Palani S.
        The Effects of Clinical Pharmacist Education on Lifestyle Modifications of Postmyocardial Infarction Patients in South India: A Prospective Interventional Study.
        Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 92100577https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2020.100577