Advertisement
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Clinical Research|Articles in Press

Utility of Substrate Mapping Using Extra-systole to Localize Comprehensive Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits - Results from Intra-Operative Mapping Studies

Published:March 12, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2023.02.074

      Abstract

      Background

      Substrate mapping-based identification of all ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits (diastolic activation), including partial and complete diastolic circuits in clinical and non-clinical VT, could be beneficial in guiding VT ablation to prevent VT recurrence. The utility of extrasystole induced late potentials has not been compared to late potentials in sinus rhythm and RV pacing.

      Methods

      Intraoperative simultaneous panoramic endocardial mapping of 21 VTs in 16 ischemic heart disease patients was performed using a 112-bipole endocardial balloon. The decrement of near field EGM later than surface QRS during extrasystole (eLP) was studied.

      Results

      Patients were predominantly male (75%) with a mean age of 52 ± 9 yrs. The mean sensitivity of eLP (0.75[95% CI:0.72-0.78]) to detect VT circuits was better than SR (0.33[95% CI:0.30-0.36] p<0.001) and RVp (0.36[95% CI:0.33-0.39] p<0.001) without significant differences in specificity, eLP (0.77[95% CI:0.74-0.81], SR (0.82[95% CI:0.80- 0.84] p=0.23), and RV pacing (0.81[95% CI:0.78-0.83] p=0.11). Both NPV and PPV were significantly better for eLP mapping. The mean NPV was 0.77(0.74-0.81), 0.57(0.55-0.59), and 0.58(0.55-0.61) for eLP, SR, and RVp respectively (p<0.0001). PPV was 0.75(0.72-0.78), 0.63(0.59-0.67) and 0.63(0.59-0.67) for eLP, SR, and RVp respectively (p<0.001). Overall diagnostic performance (AUC) was significantly better for eLP (0.85[95% CI:0.80-0.90] compared to SR (0.63[95% CI:0.56-0.72] p<0.001) or RVp (0.61[95% CI:0.52-0.74] p<0.001).

      Conclusion

      Evoked late potential mapping is a better tool to detect comprehensive diastolic circuits activated during ventricular tachycardia, compared to late potential mapping in sinus rhythm or RV pacing.

      Graphical abstract

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References:

        • Sears SF
        • Conti JB
        Quality of life and psychological functioning of ICD patients.
        Heart. 2002; 87: 488-493
        • Stevenson WG
        • Sapp JL
        Newer Methods for VT Ablation and When to Use Them.
        Can J Cardiol. 2021;
        • Tanner H
        • Hindricks G
        • Volkmer M
        • et al.
        Catheter ablation of recurrent scar‐related ventricular tachycardia using electroanatomical mapping and irrigated ablation technology: results of the prospective multicenter Euro‐VT‐study.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21: 47-53
        • Marchlinski FE
        • Haffajee CI
        • Beshai JF
        • et al.
        Long-term success of irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation of sustained ventricular tachycardia: post-approval THERMOCOOL VT trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 674-683
        • Di Biase L
        • Burkhardt JD
        • Lakkireddy D
        • et al.
        Ablation of stable VTs versus substrate ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy: the VISTA randomized multicenter trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 2872-2882
        • Jaïs P
        • Maury P
        • Khairy P
        • et al.
        Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia.
        Circulation. 2012; 125: 2184-2196
        • Yokokawa M
        • Desjardins B
        • Crawford T
        • Good E
        • Morady F
        • Bogun F
        Reasons for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 66-73
        • Segal OR
        • Chow AW
        • Markides V
        • Schilling RJ
        • Peters NS
        • Davies DW
        Long-term results after ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia.
        Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2: 474-482
        • Di Biase L
        • Santangeli P
        • Burkhardt DJ
        • et al.
        Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 132-141
        • Tung R
        • Mathuria NS
        • Nagel R
        • et al.
        Impact of local ablation on interconnected channels within ventricular scar: mechanistic implications for substrate modification.
        Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013; 6: 1131-1138
        • Silberbauer J
        • Oloriz T
        • Maccabelli G
        • et al.
        Noninducibility and late potential abolition: a novel combined prognostic procedural end point for catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia.
        Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2014; 7: 424-435
        • Arenal Á
        • Hernández J
        • Calvo D
        • et al.
        Safety, long-term results, and predictors of recurrence after complete endocardial ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation in patients with previous myocardial infarction.
        Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111: 499-505
        • Vergara P
        • Trevisi N
        • Ricco A
        • et al.
        Late potentials abolition as an additional technique for reduction of arrhythmia recurrence in scar related ventricular tachycardia ablation.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23: 621-627
        • Kühne M
        • Abrams G
        • SARRAZIN J
        • et al.
        Isolated potentials and pace‐mapping as guides for ablation of ventricular tachycardia in various types of nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21: 1017-1023
        • Jackson N
        • Gizurarson S
        • Viswanathan K
        • et al.
        Decrement evoked potential mapping: basis of a mechanistic strategy for ventricular tachycardia ablation.
        Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2015; 8: 1433-1442
        • Bella PD
        • Baratto F
        • Tsiachris D
        • et al.
        Management of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of a dedicated unit for the treatment of complex ventricular arrhythmias: long-term outcome after ablation.
        Circulation. 2013; 127: 1359-1368
        • Okubo K
        • Gigli L
        • Trevisi N
        • et al.
        Long-Term Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Late Potential Abolition and VT Noninducibility.
        Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2020; 13e008307
        • Irie T
        • Yu R
        • Bradfield JS
        • et al.
        Relationship between sinus rhythm late activation zones and critical sites for scar-related ventricular tachycardia: systematic analysis of isochronal late activation mapping.
        Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2015; 8: 390-399
        • Andreu D
        • Penela D
        • Acosta J
        • et al.
        Cardiac magnetic resonance–aided scar dechanneling: Influence on acute and long-term outcomes.
        Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14: 1121-1128
        • Porta-Sánchez A
        • Jackson N
        • Lukac P
        • et al.
        Multicenter study of ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation with decrement-evoked potential (DEEP) mapping with extra stimulus.
        JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2018; 4: 307-315
        • de Riva M
        • Naruse Y
        • Ebert M
        • et al.
        Targeting the hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation improves ventricular tachycardia ablation outcome after myocardial infarction.
        JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2018; 4: 316-327
        • Acosta J
        • Andreu D
        • Penela D
        • et al.
        Elucidation of hidden slow conduction by double ventricular extrastimuli: a method for further arrhythmic substrate identification in ventricular tachycardia ablation procedures.
        EP Europace. 2018; 20: 337-346
        • Srinivasan NT
        • Garcia J
        • Schilling RJ
        • et al.
        Multicenter study of dynamic high-density functional substrate mapping improves identification of substrate targets for ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation.
        Clinical Electrophysiology. 2020; 6: 1783-1793